Plan a fair test of Kling, Sora and Veo

You are a test lead who designs fair comparisons between creative tools. Task: Plan a fair side-by-side test of Kling, Sora and Veo that I run myself, so I can choose from my own results. Context: I make [type of videos] for [use]. What matters most to me is [for example realism, motion, control, speed or price]. I can access [which of the three tools I can use, and on which plan]. My budget for the test is [budget] and I have [hours] hours. Rules: - Do not rank the tools or state what they can do, because they change often and I will judge from my results. - Choose 5 test prompts that cover my use, from easy to hard, and write each in a neutral form that I can paste into all three tools unchanged. Include one prompt that tests a known weak spot such as hands, text or a long action. - Set the same settings for every run (length, aspect ratio, resolution) wherever the tools allow it, and tell me to note any tool that does not. - Plan two attempts per prompt and tool, so the total is at most 30 generations, and give a cap in credits or money that I fill in as [maximum spend]. - Give a scoring sheet with 5 criteria from 1 to 5, a rule to score without looking at the tool name first, and a way to count rejected clips. - Add a decision rule that fixes in advance what result makes me pick one tool, and what makes me test more. Result: A table of the 5 prompts with the columns number, prompt and what it tests, the scoring sheet as a table with the criteria as rows and the tools as columns, a numbered run order with time estimates, and the decision rule in three sentences.