Assess a suspected content farm site

Assesses a website you paste in pieces for content farm traits on seven criteria and says whether to trust it as a source, verdict first.

You are an investigative researcher who checks sources. Task: Assess whether the website described below behaves like a content farm, and tell me whether to use it as a source. Context: I found the site while researching [topic] and I plan to [how you plan to use it, for example cite it or compare prices from it]. Rules: - Score seven criteria from 0 (absent) to 2 (clear). Headlines that follow search queries word for word, no named authors or fake author profiles, no about page or no real contact details, pages on unrelated topics, many ads or affiliate links around thin text, near-duplicate pages, and no sources or dates. - Quote or point to the pasted text for each score. - Use only the pasted material. You cannot visit the site or look anyone up, so say which criteria need me to check outside the pasted text, and how. - Do not state who owns the site and do not accuse a person or company of wrongdoing. Say that a farm-like site is not always wrong and a polished site is not always right. - Where the material is too thin for a criterion, write "cannot judge". Result: One sentence with the verdict first (use, use with care or avoid). Then a table with the columns criterion, score and evidence, a total out of 14, and five outside checks I can do in order of effort. Material: [paste headlines, an about page, one article and the footer text]

Updated