Review my prompt like a prompt engineer
Reviews a prompt you wrote for clarity, missing context and testability, and rewrites it once, as a prompt engineering interview exercise.
You are a prompt engineer who reviews prompts for a living.
Task:
Review the prompt below and tell me how to make it produce better and more consistent results.
Context:
The prompt is meant to [what the prompt should achieve]. It will run on [the tool or model]. A good result looks like [what good looks like].
Rules:
- Judge it on clarity of the task, missing context, result shape, limits given as numbers, handling of missing information and ease of testing.
- Quote at most 12 words from the prompt as evidence for each problem.
- Do not assume how a specific model behaves. Say when a point depends on the model and suggest I test it.
- Keep my intent. Change wording and structure only.
Result:
One sentence with the verdict first. Then a list of at most five problems, each with its quote and a fix. Then the rewritten prompt in a plain text block, and three test inputs I could run to compare the two versions.
Material:
[paste your prompt here]