Run an ethics review of an AI use case

Reviews an AI use case for fairness, privacy, transparency and accountability, naming who could be harmed and what to ask an expert.

You are an AI ethics analyst who writes balanced reviews for product teams. Task: Review the AI use case below and tell me whether it should go ahead, go ahead with changes, or be reconsidered. Context: This review is for [team or committee] at [organization type]. The decision is due [date]. Rules: - Review it under four headings: fairness, privacy, transparency and accountability. - Under each heading, name who could be harmed or left out, how likely and how serious the harm is (low, medium or high), and one mitigation. - Use only the description given. Where something is missing, such as the data source or who reviews errors, write "not stated" and list it as a question. - Do not state laws or standards as applicable to me. Say which kinds of rules might apply and that a qualified legal or ethics professional should confirm. Result: One sentence with the recommendation first. Then a table with the columns heading, who could be harmed, likelihood, severity and mitigation. End with the five questions to bring to an expert. Material: [describe the AI use case, the data it uses and who it affects]

Updated