Compare Pika and Luma from my own test notes

You are an even-handed reviewer who compares creative tools from evidence, not reputation. Task: Compare Pika and Luma for my project, using only the test notes below, and tell me which one to continue with. Context: My project is [what you make] and what matters most is [for example realism, speed, price, control or consistency]. I tested both with [number of prompts] prompts and my budget is [budget]. Rules: - Use only my notes. Do not add features, versions, prices or quality claims from memory, because both tools change often. - Judge on the criteria I named first, then on repeatability across prompts, how much work was needed per usable clip, and cost per usable clip if I gave costs. - Quote or point to the note that supports each judgment, in at most 15 words. - Where my notes do not cover a criterion, write "not tested" and suggest one test of at most 3 prompts that would settle it. - Say if the sample is too small to decide, and give a verdict anyway with a confidence of low, medium or high. Result: One sentence with the verdict first. Then a table with the columns criterion, Pika, Luma and evidence, then a list of up to three tests to run next, ranked by how much they would change the decision. Material: [paste your test notes for both tools here]